The Earl of Essex.....อัศวินการเวก

ห่านป่าที่กระพือปีกกลับรังในยามสนธยาแทบฝ่ากระแสลมไปไม่ไหว ในมหาสมุทรทิศตะวันตก มีลมและไซโครน ทำให้ท้องทะเลปั่นป่วน  หอบน้ำเป็นเกลียวพวยพุ่งจากผิวน้ำ พวยพุ่งเป็นลำและแตกกระเซ็นเป็นฟองฟู ต้นไม้ล้มระเนระนาดบนภาคพื้นแผ่นดิน  Sycamore เป็นต้นไม้จำพวก Ficus sinvsycomorus หรือ occidentalis มีลักษณะทางตะวันตก เป็นต้นไม้เนื้อแข็ง และมีลำต้นแยกเป็นสองต้น  และแต่ละต้นก็ส่งเสียงคำรามเข้าใส่กัน กิ่งไม้ถูกลมฝนกระหน่ำหักพาดลำต้นแน่นิ่งอยู่กับพื้นดินทำให้ฝูงนกบินถลาร่อนขนานพื้นทำให้กรงเล็บของแต่ละตังคลี่ตัวออกมาทำหน้าที่เป็นคล้ายสมอเรือรบเหยี่ยว เพเรกกิน เกาะอยู่บนหน้าผาขนเปียกชุ่มจนลู่แนบลำตัว

                ใต้บานประตูของปราสาท ลมกระแทกใส่เสื่อกกปูพื้น ส่งเสียงวาบวินอยู่ภายใต้บันใดเวียน เขย่าบานเกร็ดสั่นสะเทือนผ่านหน้าต่างกระจกหนา หอคอยสั่นสะเทือนเหมือนเสียงดนตรี ลาคอนชาโต้ขนานกับสายลม กระทบคลื่นเสียงผ่านแนวระนาบสัมผัสพรมปักด้วยดิ้เงินแวววาวดังกระหึ่มเหมือนมีเครื่องสายนำโดยแชลโล่ของ นักแต่งเพลงชื่อดัง *มารี มายรัส* ในเพลง *ระฆังของเทพยดา จีนิวีบ*....

                บอร์ส และ เบลโอเบรีสกำลังหมอบเหนือกองไฟลุกโพลง เหมืนในภาพวาด..

                *แต่ทำไมพวกเขาไปกันเร็วนักเล่า* บอร์สถามอย่างมีข้อกังขา

                *ข้าไม่เคยเห็นกองทัพที่ไหนยกกำลังมาล้อมเมืองไว้แต่ก็ยกทัพกลับอย่างรวดเร็วขนาดนั้น โดยที่พวกเขารื้อถอนค่ายไปเพียงแค่ชั่วข้ามคืนหายไปหมดเหมือนถูกลมหอบไป*

*คงจะได้ข่าวร้าย  คงจะต้องมีเรื่องไม่ชอบมาพากลในอังกฤษเกิดขึ้นก็เป็นได้*

*ถ้าพวกเขาต้องการยกโทษให้ลานสล๊อตก็คงส่งสาสน์มาแล้ว*

                *ดูแปลกอยู่หรอกโดยกลับไปปุบปับโดยไม่บอกกล่าว*

                *เจ้าคิดว่าอาจเกิดกบฏขึ้นใน คอร์นวอลล์ หรือเปล่า หรือในเวลล์หรือบางทีในไอร์แลนด์*

                *มีพวกบรรพชนอยู่นี่นา*  เบลโอเบรีสเห็นพ้องออกอาการมึนงง

                *ข้าไม่คิดว่าเป็นเรื่องกบฏนะ ข้าคิดว่าพระราชาทรงประชวร และต้องอัญเชิญกลับโดยด่วน หรือไม่การเวกต้องป่วยหนัก ที่โดนลานสล๊อตฟาดด้วยโล่ ให้เป็นกำนัลถึงสองครั้ง อาจจะโดนที่ศิรษะของเขาอย่างจัง*

                *ก็เป็นได้*

                บอร์สเคาะไฟแรงๆ *จากไปแบบนั้น แล้วก็ไม่พูดอะไรสักคำ*

                *ทำไมลานสล๊อตไม่ทำอะไรบ้างละ*

                *จะให้เขาทำอะไรได้*

                *ไม่รู้สิ*

                *พระเจ้าอยู่หัวขับเขาออกจากประเทศนี่*

                *ใช่*

                *ง้นก็ไม่มีอะไรให้ทำเลย*

                *ถึงอย่างไร* เบลโอเบริส กล่าว *ข้าก็หวังว่าเขาจะทำอะไรบ้าง*

                ประตูที่ตีนบันไดเปิดออกพร้อมด้วยเสียงย่ำบันไดเวียนลงมาจากหอคอยเล็ก พรมทำด้วยต้นกกตั้งตรงขึ้น ควันพวยพุ่งจากกองไฟในเตา และเสียงของลานสล๊อตดังรอดเสียงลมลั่น  *บอร์ส เบลโอริส เดมาริส*

                *อยู่ตรงนี้*

                *ตรงไหน*

                **บนนี้

ได้ยินเสียงประตูปิดดังมาไกลๆ  ความเงียบกลับเข้ามาในห้อง  เสื่อทอต้นกกล้มลงพื้นกลับเข้าที่เดิม และเสียงฝีเท้าของลานสล๊อตดังชัดเจนขึ้นสะท้อนก้องตามขั้นบันใดหิน ทั้งๆที่เมื่อสักครู่เสียงตะโกนของเขาฟังแทบไม่ออก เขาเข้ามาอย่างรีบร้อนมือถือจดหมาย ลั่นเสียงกระแอมไอ  *บอร์ส เบลโอริส เดมาริส*

*ข้าตามหาเจ้าอยู่*

                *มีจดหมายมาจากอังกฤษ* พวกเขายืนขึ้น

*นกส่งสารถูกพัดขึ้นฝั่ง ไกลจากชายฝั่งที่นี่ขึ้นไปห้าไมล์*

                *เราต้องออกเดินทางทันทีเลย*

                *”ปอังกฤษหรือ*

*ใช่*

                *ฬว่ ไปอังกฤษซิ  ข้าได้บอกไลน์โอแนล ให้จัดการเรื่องพาหนะแล้ว และข้าต้องการให้เจ้า บอล์ส จัดการเรื่องเสบียงนะ*

                *เราต้องรอให้กำลังลมอ่อนตัวลงก่อน*

                *เราจะไปทำไมหรือ* บอล์สถาม *ท่านต้องบอกเราว่ามีข่าวอะไร*

*ข่วหรือ*

                *ข่าหรือ* เขาพูดตะกุกตะกักสุ้มเสียงคลุมเครือ

                *ยังไม่มีเวลาสำหรับช่าวหรอก ข้าจะเล่าให้ฟังในเรือ เอ้า อ่านจดหมายนี่ก่อน*

                เขายื่นจดหมายให้บอล์ส แล้วออกไปก่อนที่พวกเขาจะทันตอบ *ว่าไง*

                *อ่านสิ*

                *ข้าไม่รู้ว่าใครเขียนมาด้วยซ้ำ*

*อ่านไปก็คงรู้เองน่า*           

                ลานสล๊อตกลับเข้ามาก่อนที่พวกเขาจะอ่านได้ไปไกลกว่าวันที่

                *เบลโอโบริส*เขาบอก *ข้าลืมไป ข้าต้องการให้เจ้าดูแลเรื่องม้า เอาจดหมายมาก่อน ถ้าเจ้าสองคนค่อยๆสะกดละก็ เจ้าต้องอ่านอยู่ทั้งคืนแน่*

                *เขียนมาว่าอย่างไรละ*

*ข่าวนี้มาจากนกสื่สาร ดูเหมือนว่า มอร์เดร๊ดเป็นกบฏต่อพระเจ้าอาณ์เธอร์ ประกาศตนเป็นประมุขแห่งอังกฤษ และเขาได้ขอให้ วอนีเวียร์ แต่งงานกับเขา*

                *แต่นางแต่งงานแล้วนี่* เบลโอเบรีสท้วง

                *นั่นเป็นสาเหตูที่พวกนั้นเลิกปิดล้อมพวกเราไง*

                *แล้วดูเหมือนว่ามอร์เดร้ดยกทัพไปรวมที่เค็นต์ เพื่อขัดขวางไม่ให้พระเจ้าอยู่หัวขึ้นฝั่ง*

*เขาประกาศไปว่าพระเจ้าอาร์เธอร์ทรงสวรรคตแล้ว*

*เขากำลังล้อมจับพระราชินีโดยระดมยิงปืนใหญ่ไปที่หอคอยแห่งลอนดอน*

*ปืนใหญ่*

*ใช่ เขามารอพบอาร์เธอร์ที่โดเวอร์ และทำการสู้รบเพื่อมิให้พระองค์ขึ้นฝั่ง สู้กันทั้งบนบกและในน้ำ แต่พระเจ้าอยู่หัวทรงขึ้นฝั่งได้ รอวันประกาศชัยชนะ*

*ใครส่งจดหมายมา*

ลานสลอ๊ตทรุดตัวลงนั่งทันที *มาจาก ขุนพลการเวก*

*การเวกที่น่าสงสาร เขาตายแล้ว*

เบลโอเบริสตั้งกระทู้ *ตายแล้วเขียนได้อย่างไร*

*สารนั้นอ่านแล้วน่าสลดใจเหลือเกิน*

*การเวกเป็นคนดี พวกเจ้าทุกคนที่บังคับให้ข้าสู้กับเขา โดยไม่ได้เห็นแก่จิตใจที่งดงามของเขา*

                *อ่าซิ* ฮอร์สบอกกล่าวอย่างร้อนใจ

*ดูเหมือนว่าแผลที่ข้าฟาดหัวเขามันฉกรรจ์มาก เขาไม่ควรจะรีบเดินทางไปหรอก แต่เขาว้าเหว่ทุกข์ทรมานและถูกหักหลัง* น้องชายคนเล้กกลายเป็นคนทรยศ เขายากรานจะกลับไปช่วยพระเจ้าอยู่หัว ในศึกตอนขึ้นฝั่ง เขาพยายามจะสู้ เคราะห์ร้ายเขาถูกตีซ้ำตรงลอยแผลเก่า และเสียชีวิตในอีกสองสามชั่วโมง ต่อมา

*ข้าไม่เห็นว่าทำไมเจ้าถึงต้องเดือดร้อนขนาดนี้*

*ฟังจดหมายนี่สิ*

*ลานสลอ๊ต ถือจดหมายไปที่หน้าต่างและเงียบลง ขณะที่พินิจดูจดหมาย มีอะไรที่หน้าตื้นตันอยู่ในนั้น*

*แต่เซอร์ลานสล๊อต ยอดอัศวินผู้สูงส่งโดยที่ข้าได้ประจักษในชีวิตของข้า ข้า-เซอร์การเวก อัศวินโต๊ะกลมโอรสของพระเจ้า ล๊อต แห่งอ๊อกนีย์ บุตรแห่งพระเชษฐ์ภคินีแห่งพระเจ้าอยู่หัวอาณ์เธอร์ผู้ประเสริฐ ขอแสดงความเคารพมายังท่าน*

*และข้าขอให้โลกทั้งโลกตระหนักว่า ข้าเซอร์การเวก ขอตายด้วยน้ำมือของท่าน และมิใช่ด้วยเจตนาของท่าน  แต่เป็นเจตจำนงของข้าเอง  ข้าขอวิงวอนให้ท่าน เซอร์ลานสล๊อต กลับสู่ราชอาณาจักรแห่งนี้อีกครั้ง เพื่อมาเยี่ยมหลุมศพของข้า และสวดภาวนาให้แก่หลุมศพที่ข้านอนรอคอยท่านอยู่โปรดภาวนาให้แก่ดวงวิญญาณของข้าด้วยข และวันนี้ที่ข้าเขียนสาสน์ฉบับนี้  ข้าบาดเจ็บถึงฆาตด้วยบาดแผลที่มาจากน้ำมือท่าน เซอร์ลานสล๊อต ด้วยข้าพอใจที่จะไม่ถูกสังหารด้วยบุคคลผู้ประเสริฐไปกว่านี้อีกแล้ว.

                *นอกจากนั้น เซอร์ลานสล๊อต เพื่อความรักที่มีอยู่ระหว่างเรา....*

                ลานสล๊อต หยุดอ่านและโยนสาสน์ลงบนโต๊ะ   *เอา*  เขาบอก *ข้าอ่านต่อไปไม่ไหวแล้ว เขาขอให้ข้ารีบเดินทางไปเพื่อช่วยพระเจ้าอยู่หัวต่อสู้กับน้องชายของเขาและญาติคนสุดท้ายของเขา การเวกรักญาติของเขามากนะ บอร์ และท้ายที่สุดเขาก็ไม่เหลือใครเลย  แต่เขายังเขียนมายกโทษให้ข้า เขาบอกด้วยซ้ำว่าเป็นความผิดของเขาเอง พระเจ้าทรงทราบว่าเขาเป็นพี่ชายที่ดีเหลือเกิน*

*แล้วเราจะทำอย่างไรเรื่องพระเจ้าอยู่หัว*ฃ*เราต้องไปอังกฤษให้เร็วที่สุดเท่าที่จะทำได้ มอร์เด็รดถอยทัพไปที่แกรนเบอรี่แล้ว  เขากำลังจะออกศึกครั้งใหม่ที่นั่น  ตอนนี้มันอาจจะจบลงแล้วก็ได้  ข่าวนี้มาถึงล่าช้าเพราะติดพายุ ทุกสิ่งทุกอย่างขึ้นอยู่กับความเร็วแล้ว*

/เบลโอเบริสบอกว่า *ข้าจะไปดูเรื่องม้า  เราจะออกเรือกันเมื่อไหร่*

                *พรุ่งนี้ คืนนี้ เดี๋ยวนี้เลย เมื่อลมซาลง เร็วเข้าเถิด*

                *แล้วเจ้านะบอร์ส เรื่องเสบียง*

                *ตกลง*

                บอร์สซึ่งเหลืออยู่คนเดียวกับลมพายุ หยิบจดหมายขึ้นมาอย่างกระหายไคร่รู้ เขาตะแคงจดหมายลงรับแสงไฟทีเริ่มจะอ่อน เขาสะกดตอนท้ายจดหมาย ปากขยับอ่านคำ

                *และวันที่ข้าเขียนจดหมายฉบับนี้ เพียงสองชั่วโมงครึ่งก่อนความตายมาถึง เขียนด้วยลายมือของข้าเอง และจารึกนามไว้ด้วยเลือดจากหัวใจข้า

การเวกแห่งอ๊อกนีย์*

The Earl of Essex, plotted revenge on February 8, 1601m he rode from his house in the Strand into the city in an attempt to rouse the citizens of London to rebellion. Instead the city gates shut upon him. The death of Essex, last of the courtiers who had fascinated their sovereign, Elizabeth I, marked the end of an era. 

Elizabeth I

 Elizabeth rode down from Hatfield to London. On January 14, 1959, the day before the coronation, all the London turned out to see her. She did not disappoint them. “Dress in a royal robe  of very rich cloth of gold”. Elizabeth I on her coronation procession set out from the Tower to the sound of trumpets, with an entourage of 1,000 horses, four centuries ago. The most famous of all her progress took place in 1575, when the Queen and an enormous retinue made a triumphal journey through

Northamptonshire. Of all the countries of England, Warwickshire, probably the most attractions than any other for the reason that lies Straitford upon Avon,

William Shakespere’s birthplace and the home to which he retired in Staffordshire where performances of Henry IV that preserves the antiquities of the town, alas at Worchestershire,  and back to Woodstock in Oxfordshire. She arrved on Saturday evening, July 9, 1575. To make her 19-day visit memorable, Leicaster lavished a fortune, on pageantry that excited the whole countryside. William Shakespeare, then only 11, might well have trudged the 13 miles from Stratford to see the marvels. Day after days, pageants and shows grew extravagant. In outer courtyard to see dears for days. The Elizabethans had an insatiable appetite for drama, which provided them with stirring entertainment, moral instruction, and historical information. Shakespeare reflected this theatrical fashion, but he gave to his plays a universality that made them meaningful to all ages. Although Hamlet follows the pattern of blood and thunder murder plays, Shakespeare turned it into an immortal philosophic drama. The impressive ruins of the Earl of Leicaster’s castle at Kenilworth provided a faint clue of grandeur that Elizabeth saw the plays that Shakespere described, the lack of perfection.

          When Elizabeth had to choose a commander to fight the rebellious Earl of Tyrone in Ulster she sent Robert Devereux, the Earl of Essex on his way to Ireland on march 27,1599. He failed and returned to

London. With bitter and angry he plotted revenge. On February 8, 1601.Link to The Earl of Essex. The Essex rebellion had failed for this he was sentenced beheaded on the Tower’s yard on February 25, 1601. Through the first three weeks of March in 1603 the Privy Counsil visited her and asked if she approved james VI of Scotland, the son of mary Staurt as her successor. Early on the morning of March 14, 1603. The great Queen left to her successor a great country.

Queen Elizabeth,The Third child of Tudor's dynasty

Eighteen miles up the Thames from Tilbury lies Greenwich, where Elizabeth's story began. Along the same strech the Lord Myer and the alderman of London made a pleasant passage in ceremonial barges on Wednesday, September 10,1533. Their destination, was Greenwich, to attend the christening at Grey Friars Church of a baby girl with a wisp of red hair, born the previous Sunday to Queen Anne Boleyn and King Henry VIII, who was disappointed but the new Princess was christened with all royal pomp. Thomas Cranner, Arcbishop of Canterbury, stood as her godfather. In the play of henry VIII which is attributed to Shakespere. Accused of treason to Henry, Anne Boleyn went to the block on Tower

Green on a May morning in 1536. After six years of King Edward's throne. Elizabeth's half sister, Mary Tudor, daughter of Catherine of Aragon, cameto the throne as an ardent Cathoric.

On the rainy Sunday of 1554,Elizabeth was taken by bargr to Traitor'sStairs. At sight of the portcullis of Traitors' Gate

Though unconvinced of Elizabeth innocence, Queen Mary declined to heed the advisers who wish to executed her sister. After two months of uncertainty, Elizabeth was released from the Tower and confined in an old loyal palace at Woodstock. On an idyllic spring day, eight miles Northwest of oxford the little town of Woodstock slumbers with it memories and its ghosts. For nearly stands the entrance to Blenheim Palace, where Sir Winston Churchill was born. Not far away from the churchyard of the village of Bladon, he lies buried. Great beeches mottled the ground with shadows as I strode across fields toward the

Fiver Glyme and the site of the palace where the young princess Elizabeth had been kept a prisoner. I contended with a heard of red Devon cattle for a sight of the spot, marked now only by a stone cairn. S contemporary historian reported she scratched a verse with a diamond on the windowpane at Woodstock: “Much suspected,  by me. Nothing proved can be. Quote Elizabeth, prisoner.”
       In the spring of 1555 Mary had Elizabeth brought from Woodstock to Hampton Court, where she remained in the close custody for a few weeks. At length Elizabeth was allowed to move to Hatfield, where she had spent much of her youth. Captive a rose-bowered seclusion, Elizabeth while away the hours in the Old palace at Hatfied during Mary’s reign. When in November, 1558, mary died, Elizabeth’s childhood friend Robert Dudley galloped here to her sidet o cry “Long live the Queen!”. In

such a plight a young woman, burdened with the care of state, drew upon her own inner wisdom and became the first master politician of Europe. Events in Europe had been building up. In 1572 Wikipedia on course of religious war. The mantle of Protestant leadership was falling upon Elizabeth’s shoulders. Fate, however , have moved to alter the situation. Mary married her cousin henry Stuart, Lord Darnley, and gave birth to a son, James. But she tired of Darnley, and fell in love with the Earl of Bothwell,who helped plot the murder of her ailing husband, on the night of February 9, 1567. Driven out of Scotlsnd by her irritate subjects, Mary took refuge to England. Elizabeth found her cousin ‘an acute embarrassment’. To give mary liberty was the jeopardy to her safety, Mary involved herself plotted the English Queen’s assassination. Parlament demanded the Queen of Scots’ life. On February 8, 1587 after Elizabeth had Mary removed from to Fotheringhay in Northamptonshire and placed on trial for treason, mary of Scotland was beheaded.

............ Knighted in white satin

Post by Thon Nontaz.

queen mother's skill

The St. Bartholomew's Day massacre (Massacre de la Saint-Barthélemy in French) in 1572 was a targeted group of assassinations, followed by a wave of Roman Catholic mob violence, both directed against the Huguenots (French Calvinist Protestants), during the French Wars of Religion. Traditionally believed to have been instigated by Catherine de' Medici, the mother of King Charles IX,

the massacre took place four days after the wedding of the king's sister Margaret to the Protestant Henry III of Navarre. This marriage was an occasion for which many of the most wealthy and prominent Huguenots had gathered in largely Catholic Paris. The massacre began on 23 August 1572 (the eve of the feast of Bartholomew the Apostle), two days after the attempted assassination of Admiral Gaspard de Coligny, the military and political leader of the Huguenots. The king ordered the killing of a group of Huguenot leaders, including Coligny, and the slaughter spread throughout Paris. Lasting several weeks, the massacre expanded outward to other urban centres and the countryside. Modern estimates for the number of dead vary widely, from 5,000 to 30,000. The massacre also marked a turning point in the French Wars of Religion. The Huguenot political movement was crippled by the loss of many of its prominent aristocratic leaders, as well as many re-conversions by the rank and file, and those who remained were increasingly radicalized. Though by no means unique, it "was the worst of the century's religious massacres." Throughout Europe, it "printed on Protestant minds the indelible conviction that Catholicism was a bloody and treacherous religion".

An unacceptable peace and an unacceptable marriageThe Peace of Saint-Germain put an end to three years of terrible civil war between Catholics and Protestants. This peace, however, was precarious since the more intransigent Catholics refused to accept it. With the Guise family who led this faction out of favour at the French court, the Huguenot leader Admiral Gaspard de Coligny was readmitted into the king's council in September 1571. Staunch Catholics were shocked by the return of Protestants to the court, but the queen mother Catherine de' Medici and her son Charles IX were determined not to let war break out again. They were also conscious of the kingdom's financial difficulties, which led them to uphold the peace and remain on friendly terms with Coligny. The Huguenots were in a strong defensive position as they controlled the fortified towns of La Rochelle, La Charité-sur-Loire, Cognac, and Montauban. To cement the peace between the two religious parties, Catherine planned to marry her daughter Margaret to the Protestant prince Henry of Navarre (the future King Henry IV). The royal marriage was arranged for 18 August 1572. It was not accepted by traditionalist Catholics or by the Pope. Both the Pope and King Philip II of Spain strongly condemned Catherine's policy. Tension in Paris[edit] Charles IX of France, who was 22 years old in August 1572The impending marriage led to the gathering of a large number of well-born Protestants in Paris, who had come to escort their prince. But Paris was a violently anti-Huguenot city, and Parisians, who tended to be extreme Catholics, found their presence unacceptable. Encouraged by Catholic preachers, they were horrified at the marriage of a princess of France with a Protestant. The Parlement of Paris itself decided to snub the marriage ceremony.[citation needed] Compounding this bad feeling was the fact that the harvests had been poor and taxes had risen. The rise in food prices and the luxury displayed on the occasion of the royal wedding increased tensions among the common people. A particular point of tension was an open-air cross erected on the site of the house of Philippe de Gastines, a Huguenot who had been executed in 1569. The mob had torn down his house and erected a large wooden cross on a stone base. Under the terms of the peace, and after considerable popular resistance, this had been removed in December 1571 (and re-erected in a cemetery), which had already led to about 50 deaths in riots, as well as mob destruction of property. In the massacres of August, the relatives of the Gastines family were among the first to be killed by the mob. The court itself was extremely divided. Catherine had not obtained the Pope Gregory XIII's permission to celebrate this irregular marriage; consequently, the French prelates hesitated over which attitude to adopt. It took all the queen mother's skill to convince the Cardinal de Bourbon to marry the couple. Beside this, the rivalries between the leading families re-emerged. The Guises were not prepared to make way for their rivals, the House of Montmorency. François, Duke of Montmorency and governor of Paris, was unable to control the disturbances in the city. Faced with a dangerous situation in Paris, he elected to leave town a few days before the wedding.[citation needed] Shift in Huguenot thought[edit]In the years preceding the massacre, Huguenot "political rhetoric" had for the first time taken a tone against not just the policies of a particular monarch of France, but monarchy in general. In part this was led by an apparent change in stance by John Calvin in his Readings on the Prophet Daniel, a book of 1561, in which he had argued that when kings disobey God, they "automatically abdicate their worldly power" - a change from his views in earlier works that even ungodly kings should be obeyed. This change was soon picked up by Huguenot writers, who began to expand on Calvin and promote the idea of the sovereignty of the people, ideas to which Catholic writers and preachers responded fiercely.[8] Nevertheless, it was only in the aftermath of the massacre that anti-monarchical ideas found widespread support from Huguenots, among the "Monarchomachs" and others. “Huguenot writers, who had previously, for the most part, paraded their loyalty to the Crown, now called for the deposition or assignation of a Godless king who had either authorised or permitted the slaughter”. Thus, the massacre "marked the beginning of a new form of French Protestantism: one that was openly at war with the crown. This was much more than a war against the policies of the crown, as in the first three civil wars; it was a campaign against the very existence of the Gallican monarchy itself". Huguenot intervention in the Netherlands[edit]Tensions were further raised when in May 1572 the news reached Paris that a French Huguenot army under Louis of Nassau had crossed from France to the Netherlandish province of Hainault and captured the Catholic strongholds of Mons and Valenciennes (now in Belgium and France, respectively). Louis governed the Principality of Orange around Avignon in southern France for his brother William the Silent, who was leading the Dutch Revolt against the Spanish. This intervention threatened to involve France in that war; many Catholics believed that Coligny had again persuaded the king to intervene on the side of the Dutch, as he had managed to do the previous October, before Catherine had got the decision reversed.The attempted assassination of Admiral de Coligny[edit] This popular print shows the attempted assassination of Coligny at left, his subsequent murder at right, and scenes of the general massacre in the streets.After the wedding on the 18 August 1572, Coligny and the leading Huguenots remained in Paris in order to discuss some outstanding grievances about the Peace of St. Germain with the king. On 22 August, an attempt was made on Coligny's life as he made his way back to his house from the Louvre. He was shot from an upstairs window, and seriously wounded. The would-be assassin, Maurevert, escaped in the ensuing confusion, and it is still difficult today to decide who was ultimately responsible for the attack. History records three possible candidates: The Guises: the Cardinal of Lorraine (who was in fact in Rome at the time), and his nephews, the Dukes of Guise and Aumale, are the most likely suspects. The leaders of the Catholic party, they wanted to avenge the death of the two dukes' father Francis, Duke of Guise, whose assassination ten years earlier they believed to have been ordered by Coligny. The shot aimed at Admiral de Coligny came from a house belonging to the Guises. The Duke of Alba: he governed the Netherlands on behalf of Philip II. Coligny planned to lead a campaign in the Netherlands to participate in the Dutch Revolt to free the region from Spanish control. During the summer, Coligny had secretly dispatched a number of troops to help the Protestants in Mons, who were now besieged by the Duke of Alba. So Admiral de Coligny was a real threat to the latter. Catherine de' Medici: according to tradition, the Queen Mother had been worried that the king was increasingly becoming dominated by Coligny. Amongst other things, Catherine reportedly feared that Coligny's influence would drag France into a war with Spain over the Netherlands.[citation needed] The massacres[edit] Preparation for the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre, 19th-century paintingParis[edit]The attempted assassination of Coligny triggered the crisis that led to the massacre. Admiral de Coligny was the most respected Huguenot leader and enjoyed a close relationship with the king, although he was distrusted by the king's mother. Aware of the danger of reprisals from the Protestants, the king and his court visited Coligny on his sickbed and promised him that the culprits would be punished.

While the Queen Mother was eating dinner, Protestants burst in to demand justice, some talking in menacing terms. Fears of Huguenot reprisals grew. Coligny's brother-in-law led a 4,000-strong army camped just outside Paris and, although there is no evidence it was planning to attack, Catholics in the city feared it might take revenge on the Guises or the city populace itself. That evening, Catherine held a meeting at the Tuileries Palace with her Italian advisers, including Albert de Gondi, Comte de Retz. On the evening of 23 August, Catherine went to see the king to discuss the crisis. Though no details of the meeting survive, Charles IX and his mother took the decision to eliminate the Protestant leaders, Holt speculates perhaps "between two and three dozen noblemen" who were still in Paris. Other historians are reluctant to speculate on the composition or size of the group of leaders targeted at this point, beyond the few obvious heads. Most potential candidates were accompanied by groups of gentlemen as staff and bodyguards like Coligny; so, each killing of a leader could have been expected to involve killing these as well. Shortly after this decision, the municipal authorities of Paris were summoned. They were ordered to shut the city gates and to arm the citizenry in order to prevent any attempt at a Protestant uprising. The king's Swiss Guard was given the task of killing a list of leading Protestants. It is difficult today to determine the exact chronology of events and to know the moment the killing began. It seems a signal was given by ringing bells for matins (between midnight and dawn) at the church of Saint-Germain l'Auxerrois, near the Louvre, which was the parish church of the kings of France. Before this, the Swiss guards had expelled the Protestant nobles from the Louvre castle and then slaughtered them in the streets. One morning at the gates of the Louvre, 19th-century painting by Édouard Debat-Ponsan. Catherine de' Medici is in black. The scene from Dubois (above) re-imagined.A group led by Guise in person dragged Admiral Coligny from his bed, killed him, and threw his body out of the window. Huguenot nobles in the building had first put up a fight.] The tension that had been building since the Peace of St. Germain now exploded in a wave of popular violence. The common people began to hunt Protestants throughout the city, including women and children. Chains were used to block streets so that Protestants could not escape from their houses. The bodies of the dead were collected in carts and thrown into the Seine. The massacre in Paris lasted three days despite the king's attempts to stop it. Holt concludes that "while the general massacre might have been prevented, there is no evidence that it was intended by any of the elites at court," listing a number of cases where Catholic courtiers intervened to save individual Protestants who were not in the leadership. The two leading Huguenot princes, Henry of Navarre and his cousin the Prince of Condé (respectively aged 19 and 20), were spared as they pledged to convert to Catholicism; both would renounce their conversions when they had escaped Paris.  On August 26, the king and court established the official version of events by going to the Paris Parlement. "Holding a lit de justice, Charles declared that he had ordered the massacre in order to thwart a Huguenot plot against the royal family." A jubilee celebration, including a procession, was then held, while the killings continued in parts of the city. In the provinces[edit]Although Charles had dispatched orders to his provincial governors on August 24 to prevent violence and maintain the terms of the 1570 edict, from August to October, similar massacres of Huguenots took place in a total of twelve other cities: Toulouse, Bordeaux, Lyon, Bourges, Rouen, Orléans, Meaux, Angers, La Charité, Saumur, Gaillac and Troyes. In most of them, the killings swiftly followed the arrival of the news of the Paris massacre, but in some places there was a delay of more than a month. According to Mack P. Holt: "All twelve cities where provincial massacres occurred had one striking feature in common; they were all cities with Catholic majorities where there had once been significant Protestant minorities.... All of them had also experienced serious religious division... during the first three civil wars... Moreover seven of them shared a previous experience ... [they] had actually been taken over by Protestant minorities during the first civil war..." The Siege of La Rochelle (1572–1573) began soon after the St. Bartholomew massacre.In several cases the Catholic party in the city believed they had received orders from the king to begin the massacre, some conveyed by visitors to the city, and in other cases apparently coming from a local nobleman or his agent. It seems unlikely any such orders came from the king, although the Guise faction may have desired the massacres. Apparently genuine letters from the Duke of Anjou, the king's younger brother, did urge massacres in the king's name; in Nantes the mayor fortunately held on to his without publicising it until a week later when contrary orders from the king had arrived. In some cities the massacres were led by the mob, while the city authorities tried to suppress them, and in others small groups of soldiers and officials began rounding up Protestants with little mob involvement. In Bordeaux the inflammatory sermon on September 29 of a Jesuit, Edmond Auger, encouraged the massacre that was to occur a few days later. In the cities affected the loss to the Huguenot communities after the massacres was numerically far larger than those actually killed; in the following weeks there were mass conversions to Catholicism, apparently in response to the threatening atmosphere for Huguenots in these cities. In Rouen, where some hundreds were killed, the Huguenot community shrank from 16,500 to fewer than 3,000 mainly as a result of conversions and emigration to safer cities or countries. Some cities which were not affected at all by the violence nevertheless also witnessed a sharp decline in their Huguenot population. Soon afterward both sides prepared for a fourth civil war, which began before the end of the year.
Death toll

Estimates of the number that perished in the massacres, “have varied from 2,000 by a Roman Catholic apologist to 70,000 by the contemporary Huguenot duc de Sully, who himself barely escaped death". Accurate figures for casualties have never been compiled, and even in writings by modern historians there is a considerable range, though the more specialised the historian, the lower they tend to be. At the low end are figures of about 2,000 in Paris and 3,000 in the provinces, the latter figure an estimate by Philip Benedict in an article in 1978. Other estimates are about 10,000 in total, with about 3,000 in Parisand 7,000 in the provinces. At the higher end are total figures of up to 20,000, or 30,000 in total, from "a contemporary, non-partisan guesstimate" quoted by the historians Felipe Fernández-Armesto and D. Wilson. For Paris, the only hard figure is a payment by the city to workmen for collecting and burying 1,100 bodies washed up on the banks of the Seine downstream from the city in one week. Body counts relating to other payments are computed from this. Among the slain were the philosopher Petrus Ramus, and in Lyon the composer Claude Goudimel. Reactions to the massacre[edit] Gregory XIII's medalThe Politiques were horrified but many Catholics inside and outside France regarded the massacres, at least initially, as deliverance from an imminent Huguenot coup d'etat. The severed head of Coligny was apparently dispatched to Pope Gregory XIII, though it got no further than Lyons, and Pope Gregory XIII sent the king a Golden Rose. The Pope ordered a Te Deum to be sung as a special thanksgiving (a practice continued for many years after) and had a medal struck with the motto Ugonottorum strages 1572 showing an angel bearing a cross and sword next to slaughtered Protestants. The massacre, with the murder of Gaspard de Coligny above left, as depicted in a fresco by Giorgio Vasari.Pope Gregory XIII.

"The massacre was interpreted as an act of divine retribution; Coligny was considered a threat to Christendom and thus Pope Gregory XIII designated 11 September 1572 as a joint commemoration of the Battle of Lepanto and the massacre of the Huguenots." Although these formal acts of rejoicing in Rome were not repudiated publicly, privately misgivings in the papal curia grew once the nature of The question of whether the massacre had long been premeditated was not entirely settled until the late 19th century; Lord Acton changed his mind on the matter twice, finally concluding that it was not. Interpretations[edit]Role of the royal family[edit] Catherine de Medici, Charles IX's mother Over the centuries, the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre has inevitably aroused a great deal of controversy. Modern historians are still divided over the responsibility of the royal family: The traditional interpretation makes Catherine de Medici and her Catholic advisers the principal culprits in the execution of the principal military leaders. They forced the hand of a hesitant and weak-willed king in the decision of that particular execution. This traditional interpretation has been largely abandoned by modern historians including, among others, Janine Garrisson. However, in a more recent work than his history of the period Mack P. Holt concludes, of the initial conspiracy: "The ringleaders of the conspiracy appear to have been a group of four men: Henry, duke of Anjou; Chancellor Birague; the duke of Nevers, and the comte de Retz" (Gondi).
Apart from Anjou,Wittenberg_door the others were all Italian advisors at the French court. According to Denis Crouzet, Charles IX feared a Protestant uprising, and chose to strangle it at birth in order to protect his own power. The execution decision was therefore his own, and not Catherine de' Medici's. According to Jean-Louis Bourgeon, it was the violently anti-Huguenot city of Paris which was really responsible. He stresses that the city was on the verge of revolt. The Guises, who were highly popular, exploited this situation to put pressure on the King and the Queen Mother. Charles IX was thus forced to head off the potential riot, which was the work of the Guises, the city militia and the common people. According to Thierry Wanegffelen, the member of the royal family with the most responsibility in this affair is Henry, Duke of Anjou, the king's ambitious younger brother. Following the failed assassination attack against the Admiral de Coligny, which Wanegffelen attributes to the Guise family and Spain, the Italian advisers of Catherine de Medici undoubtedly recommended in the royal Council the execution of about fifty Protestant leaders to benefit from the occasion by eliminating the Huguenot danger,

but both the Queen Mother and the King were very firmly opposed. However Anjou, Lieutenant General of the Kingdom, present at this meeting of the Council, could see a good occasion to make a name for himself with the government. He contacted the Parisian authorities and another ambitious young man, running out of authority and power, Duke Henri de Guise (whose uncle, the clear-sighted Charles cardinal of Lorraine was then detained in Rome). The Parisian St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre resulted from this conjunction of interests, and this offers a much better explanation as to why the men of the Duke of Anjou acted in the name of the lieutenant general of the kingdom, consistent with the thinking of the time, rather than in the name of the King. One can also understand why, the day after the start of the massacre, Catherine de Medici had condemned by royal declaration of Charles IX the crimes, and threatened the Guise family with royal justice. But when Charles IX and his mother learned of the involvement of the duke of Anjou, and being so dependent on his support, they issued a second royal declaration, which while asking for an end to the massacres, credited the initiative with the desire of Charles IX to prevent a Protestant plot. Initially the coup d'état of the duke of Anjou was a success, but Catherine de Medici went out of her way to deprive him from any power in France: she sent him with the royal army to remain in front of La Rochelle and then had him elected the Polish king.

>